Get pentests without
the false positive noise
AI-native penetration testing for teams who outgrew vulnerability scanners but can't afford enterprise pentest platforms.
Why enterprise pentest tools frustrate mid-size teams
The tools built for Fortune 500 environments were not designed for a 4-person security team with a $50K budget. Three patterns emerge repeatedly.
Alert floods that eat engineering hours
Traditional enterprise tools rely on signature and pattern matching to flag potential vulnerabilities. Without exploit validation, they surface findings that look dangerous on paper but do not reproduce in practice. Your team spends hours triaging noise instead of fixing confirmed risks.
Attackers move in hours; weekly updates don't
Leading enterprise tools ship signature database updates on weekly or bi-weekly cycles. A critical CVE published on a Monday may not appear in your scan coverage until the following week. Adversaries do not wait for patch cycles or vendor release calendars.
$30K+ minimum locks out teams under 500 IPs
Leading enterprise pentest platforms anchor pricing to IP count and annual contracts. A team managing 50–200 assets pays proportionally the same overhead as a 10,000-node enterprise deployment. Sub-500 IP environments effectively subsidize large customers without receiving proportional value.
Real exploit evidence — not pattern matches
Three architectural choices separate AssurePort from signature-driven scanners and over-priced enterprise platforms.
Validated PoC, not low-confidence alerts
Every finding that reaches your report has a proof-of-concept attached. AssurePort's pipeline runs 11 paid scan engines — web, API, GitHub SAST, cloud infrastructure, Active Directory, SAP, email security, network/host, OSINT/recon, scan import, PCI-DSS external vulnerability scanning — with AI agents that attempt exploitation in a controlled sandbox. Findings without a working PoC are downgraded to "unconfirmed" and clearly labelled. You review evidence, not speculation.
Claude reasoning adapts in hours, not weeks
AssurePort's AI layer runs on Anthropic Claude. When a new CVE surfaces, the reasoning model updates its attack strategy without waiting for a signature file release. This is not a claim about zero-day coverage — it means the gap between "CVE published" and "covered in scan" is measured in hours rather than weekly release windows. The same model that reasons about new attack patterns also validates whether a finding is exploitable in your specific application context.
Pay-per-scan or subscribe — no contract floor
Every plan runs the same web pentest engine — the difference is scan volume and seat count, not engine access. One-time scans start at $69 (Starter) with no commitment. Pro at $199/month covers 6 web pentests/month; Business at $599/month covers 15 web pentests/month.
AssurePort vs. traditional enterprise tools
Categorically — not as a product-by-product takedown. Security buyers should evaluate any platform against their specific environment. These are the axes that matter for sub-500 IP teams.
| Feature | Traditional enterprise tools | AssurePort |
|---|---|---|
| False positive handling | High — manual triage required. Signature hits without exploit validation surface as findings. | Low — Claude validates + requires working PoC before a finding enters the report. |
| CVE coverage update cycle | Weekly signature database releases (most platforms). Critical CVEs may have a 7–14 day coverage gap. | Hours. Reasoning model reacts to published CVE context without waiting for a release cycle. |
| Minimum commitment | $30K–$100K/year annual license. IP-count anchored pricing penalises small environments. | $69 one-time Starter · $199/mo Pro · $599/mo Business. No contract minimum. |
| Compliance built-in | Typically add-on or third-party integration. ISO 27001 evidence collection is manual. | ISO 27001 Dashboard (93-control matrix). GDPR, DORA, NIS2 coverage in report output. |
| EU data residency | Most leading platforms are US-headquartered with US-primary infrastructure. | EU-native by design. Cloudflare EU + Fly.io Frankfurt. No cross-border data transfer. |
| CI/CD integration | Available on enterprise tier (extra cost or professional services required). | GitHub Action + HMAC webhooks. assureport.yml policy file — no enterprise tier required. |
| Proof-of-concept with findings | Variable. Many tools flag patterns without executing controlled exploitation. | Required. Findings without PoC are labelled "unconfirmed" and excluded from the risk score. |
Note: "Traditional enterprise tools" refers to leading automated pentest and DAST platforms in the $30K+ annual price range. Specific product names are omitted per our legal policy on comparative advertising (EU Directive 2006/114/EC).
The pattern we hear most often
From conversations with security engineers and DevSecOps leads evaluating a move away from expensive enterprise contracts.
"We were paying well over $30K a year and still spending two days every sprint triaging findings. Half of them were pattern matches with no actual exploit. We needed something that came with the evidence attached."
DevSecOps Lead, mid-size fintech (EU) · ~120 employees, 80 IP scope
Coming Q3 2026 — verified customer case studies with named accounts (DPA-approved).
Get started in 4 clicks
No credit card for sign-up. No sales call required. First pentest results in under 45 minutes.
Starter $69 one-time · Polar.sh handles VAT in 47 countries · Cancel Pro anytime
Before you switch
Honest answers to the questions teams ask when evaluating a move away from a current tool.
How long does migration take from my current tool?
Can I export my scan data?
What is the realistic ROI versus a $30K–$100K enterprise contract?
Is there a free trial for the scan engines?
Ready to drop the noise
Try AssurePort Pro
$199/month — 6 web pentests/month
AI-validated pentest findings. EU data residency. No contract minimum. Cancel anytime.
EU VAT handled by Polar.sh (Merchant of Record) · Failed scan = full token refund · DPA signed at sign-up