AI-native penetration testing for teams who outgrew vulnerability scanners but can't afford enterprise pentest platforms.
The tools built for Fortune 500 environments were not designed for a 4-person security team with a $50K budget. Three patterns emerge repeatedly.
Traditional enterprise tools rely on signature and pattern matching to flag potential vulnerabilities. Without exploit validation, they surface findings that look dangerous on paper but do not reproduce in practice. Your team spends hours triaging noise instead of fixing confirmed risks.
Leading enterprise tools ship signature database updates on weekly or bi-weekly cycles. A critical CVE published on a Monday may not appear in your scan coverage until the following week. Adversaries do not wait for patch cycles or vendor release calendars.
Leading enterprise pentest platforms anchor pricing to IP count and annual contracts. A team managing 50–200 assets pays proportionally the same overhead as a 10,000-node enterprise deployment. Sub-500 IP environments effectively subsidize large customers without receiving proportional value.
Three architectural choices separate AssurePort from signature-driven scanners and over-priced enterprise platforms.
Every finding that reaches your report has a proof-of-concept attached. AssurePort's pipeline runs 8 paid scan engines — web, API, mobile APK, GitHub SAST, cloud infrastructure, Active Directory, SAP, email security — with AI agents that attempt exploitation in a controlled sandbox. Findings without a working PoC are downgraded to "unconfirmed" and clearly labelled. You review evidence, not speculation.
AssurePort's AI layer runs on Anthropic Claude. When a new CVE surfaces, the reasoning model updates its attack strategy without waiting for a signature file release. This is not a claim about zero-day coverage — it means the gap between "CVE published" and "covered in scan" is measured in hours rather than weekly release windows. The same model that reasons about new attack patterns also validates whether a finding is exploitable in your specific application context.
Every plan runs the same web pentest engine — the difference is scan volume and seat count, not engine access. One-time scans start at $99 (Starter) with no commitment. Pro at $299/month covers 6 scans with rollover; Business at $799/month covers 15 scans.
Categorically — not as a product-by-product takedown. Security buyers should evaluate any platform against their specific environment. These are the axes that matter for sub-500 IP teams.
| Feature | Traditional enterprise tools | AssurePort |
|---|---|---|
| False positive handling | High — manual triage required. Signature hits without exploit validation surface as findings. | Low — Claude validates + requires working PoC before a finding enters the report. |
| CVE coverage update cycle | Weekly signature database releases (most platforms). Critical CVEs may have a 7–14 day coverage gap. | Hours. Reasoning model reacts to published CVE context without waiting for a release cycle. |
| Minimum commitment | $30K–$100K/year annual license. IP-count anchored pricing penalises small environments. | $99 one-time Starter · $299/mo Pro · $799/mo Business. No contract minimum. |
| Compliance built-in | Typically add-on or third-party integration. ISO 27001 evidence collection is manual. | ISO 27001 Dashboard (93-control matrix). GDPR, DORA, NIS2 coverage in report output. |
| EU data residency | Most leading platforms are US-headquartered with US-primary infrastructure. | EU-native by design. Cloudflare EU + Fly.io Frankfurt. No cross-border data transfer. |
| CI/CD integration | Available on enterprise tier (extra cost or professional services required). | GitHub Action + HMAC webhooks. assureport.yml policy file — no enterprise tier required. |
| Proof-of-concept with findings | Variable. Many tools flag patterns without executing controlled exploitation. | Required. Findings without PoC are labelled "unconfirmed" and excluded from the risk score. |
Note: "Traditional enterprise tools" refers to leading automated pentest and DAST platforms in the $30K+ annual price range. Specific product names are omitted per our legal policy on comparative advertising (EU Directive 2006/114/EC).
From conversations with security engineers and DevSecOps leads evaluating a move away from expensive enterprise contracts.
"We were paying well over $30K a year and still spending two days every sprint triaging findings. Half of them were pattern matches with no actual exploit. We needed something that came with the evidence attached."
DevSecOps Lead, mid-size fintech (EU) · ~120 employees, 80 IP scope
Coming Q3 2026 — verified customer case studies with named accounts (DPA-approved).
No credit card for sign-up. No sales call required. First pentest results in under 45 minutes.
Starter $99 one-time · Polar.sh handles VAT in 47 countries · Cancel Pro anytime
Honest answers to the questions teams ask when evaluating a move away from a current tool.
Ready to drop the noise
AI-validated pentest findings. EU data residency. No contract minimum. Cancel anytime.
EU VAT handled by Polar.sh (Merchant of Record) · Failed scan = full token refund · DPA signed at sign-up